🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.